4.4 • 785 Ratings
🗓️ 19 April 2019
⏱️ 25 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Lionel Shriver is an American journalist, author and Spectator columnist. Her novel We Need to Talk About Kevin – about a mother and her son who goes on to carry out a high school massacre – won the Orange Prize for fiction in 2005.
Shriver talks to Katy Balls about why she changed her name age 15, the struggles new writers face in the digital age and what role the media plays in the gun violence debate.
Women With Balls is a podcast series where Katy Balls speak to women at the top of their respective games. To hear past episodes, visit spectator.co.uk/balls.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This is Spectator Radio and you're listening to Women with Balls, presented by Katie Balls. |
0:08.0 | Hello and welcome to Women with Balls, where I, Katie Balls, speak to today's Trailblazers. |
0:15.0 | Today I'm delighted to be joined by Lionel Shriver. Shriver is an American journalist, author and spectator columnist. |
0:22.1 | Her novel, we need to talk about Kevin, about a mother and her son who goes on to carry out a |
0:26.8 | high school massacre, won the Orange Prize for Fiction in 2005. Her writing regularly touches on |
0:33.4 | current affairs and topics that can, at times, be considered taboo. She has spoken up on cultural |
0:39.1 | appropriation, suggesting that writers ought to be able to write from any perspective rather than just |
0:44.2 | the one they were born into. And she has also urged caution on writer diversity initiatives. |
0:49.8 | So, Lionel, thanks very much for joining us today. To begin on this podcast, we'd like to go back to your |
0:54.3 | early life, so what you were doing before you were in the public sphere. And you've said that, as a child, |
1:00.2 | you were born in North Carolina to a very religious family. And by the time you were 12, on Sunday |
1:06.1 | mornings, your father was literally dragging you into the car by the hair. Does that mean to say that a religious |
1:12.4 | upbringing actually had the opposite of the desired effect on you? Well, it inoculated me against |
1:18.3 | religion. I think I am incapable of converting to any faith. I think that that skepticism also extends to politics because I don't tend to join |
1:31.4 | churches. I'm not especially party political. I'm averse to joining groups of any sort, come |
1:39.8 | to think of it. So actually, having a faith system of any sort of something that you are naturally drawn away |
1:46.6 | from? I like the idea of having principles, and I like the idea of having a coherent way of looking at |
1:54.3 | the world, although I think it's important always to be able to make exceptions in the interests of |
2:00.3 | practicality, for example. |
2:02.4 | And what was it like growing up in a religious family where you are in a way the odd one out |
2:07.5 | because you're not part of that sect? |
2:11.2 | I wasn't the odd one out. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.