Three minutes after ten is the time.

Supreme Court currently ruling on that Rwanda policy.

And do you know, it is, I was going to come on air in the slightly cocky mode this morning

and congratulate myself for having given you the facts that you need.

But in the opening comments from the head of the Supreme Court,

I've had some of my own ignorance highlighted because I thought,

and this, listen, I think this is significant. I know it's a little bit self-referential,

for which I apologize, but I thought that the applications were going to be processed

according to the British system, even though they'd then stay in Rwanda.

I don't know why I thought that.

At least I'm not as daft as Ian Duncan Smith,

who thought that if the application was successful,

you'd then come back to the UK as a refugee.

In fact, quite a lot of people persisted in that belief.

In fact, you might still hold that belief now.

So, if they are deported to

Rwanda and their application for asylum is processed and they are found to be bona fide refugees,

genuine fleas of torture and misery and worse, they stay in Rwanda. I suspect that there are still

a significant number of people listening to this who don't understand that. And I was going to be

a bit smug about it until I listened to those opening comments. Because they don't. The application is

according to Rwandan asylum applications or Rwandan

asylum law. Guess how many asylum decisions Rwanda took in 2021? Just have a guess. Go on. Say a number

...