The Kill Step: Chevron Fights the Ecuadorian Government
Drilled
Pushkin Industries
4.6 • 2.4K Ratings
🗓️ 11 December 2020
⏱️ 20 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | In March 2014, Judge Louis A. Kaplan issued a nearly 500-page ruling against Donziger |
| 0:18.3 | and the Lago Agreo plaintiffs, blocking the collection of the $9 billion Ecuadorian |
| 0:23.8 | judgment in the U.S. Judge Kaplan cites in the summary of his ruling the Cabrera report |
| 0:30.6 | crude outtakes and Gera's testimony. He writes that among the various objectives of Donziger's |
| 0:37.0 | PR campaign has been an effort to quote, shift the focus from the fraud on Chevron and the |
| 0:44.7 | Lago Agreo court to the environmental harm that Donziger and the Lago Agreo plaintiffs |
| 0:50.1 | claim was done in the Oriente. There's an accent on that last E in Oriente in Judge Kaplan's |
| 0:57.0 | summary. It's a mistake, which is unfortunate given how many of the Ecuadorians we spoke with |
| 1:03.6 | accused Kaplan of being racist and or too ignorant about their country, its laws and its |
| 1:10.2 | language to oversee this case. But the sentiment that Kaplan expresses here is also really interesting. |
| 1:17.0 | How dare you shift the focus from the fraud committed against a company to the damage inflicted |
| 1:23.0 | on a community? Kaplan says we shouldn't be quote-unquote distracted by the pollution. |
| 1:29.2 | Then he writes quote, the court assumes that there is pollution in the Oriente. On that assumption, |
| 1:35.8 | Texaco and perhaps even Chevron, though it never drilled for oil in Ecuador, might bear some |
| 1:41.7 | responsibility. And yeah, the accent mistake is there on Oriente throughout this ruling. |
| 1:48.9 | Kaplan continues quote, in any case, improvement of conditions for the residents of the Oriente |
| 1:54.4 | appears to be both desirable and overdue. But the defendant's effort to change the subject to |
| 2:00.9 | the Oriente, understandable as it is as a tactic, misses the point of this case. |
| 2:07.8 | The issue here is not what happened in the Oriente more than 20 years ago and who, if anyone, |
| 2:16.5 | now is responsible for the wrongs then done. It instead is whether a court decision was procured |
| 2:23.4 | by corrupt means, regardless of whether the cause was just. An innocent defendant is no more |
| 2:31.8 | entitled to submit false evidence to co-opt and pay off a court appointed expert or to coerce or |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Pushkin Industries, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Pushkin Industries and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

