The Delphi Murders: Richard Allen Goes to the Indiana Supreme Court: Oral Arguments

Murder Sheet

MurderSheet

True Crime, Murder, Unsolved Case, Killing, Murderer, Cold Case

3.8 • 2.8K Ratings

🗓️ 18 January 2024

⏱️ 62 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Attorneys Mark Leeman — representing Richard Allen — and Matthew Gutwein — representing Judge Frances Gull — made arguments before the Indiana Supreme Court today. The stakes for the case couldn't be higher. Will Judge Gull leave the case? Or will original attorneys Andrew Baldwin and Bradley Rozzi stay off the case?

Send tips to [email protected].

The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC .

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Content warning. This episode includes discussion of the murder of two children.
0:06.7	Well, today is a big day in the Delphi murders case. This is January 18th, this is a Thursday, and we have just come from the
0:17.0	Supreme Court of Indiana hearing in the Richard Allen case. So today we're going to unpack everything we heard, all the arguments
0:26.9	from the different sides, and then discuss our analysis and what we think of the whole thing.
0:33.4	My name is Anya Kane.
0:34.7	I'm a journalist.
0:35.7	And I'm Kevin Greenlee.
0:37.2	I'm an attorney.
0:38.5	And this is the Murder Sheet.
0:40.3	We're a true crime podcast focused on original reporting, interviews, and deep dives into murder cases.
0:47.0	We're the murder sheet.
0:49.0	And this is the Delphi murders. Richard Allen goes to the Indiana Supreme Court.
0:56.0	Oral arguments. So, I'm going to do. So, So we all know what this hearing is about, what the dispute is about.
1:47.0	Basically, of course, Judge Gold removed the original defense attorneys, Bradley Rosie, and Andrew Baldwin from the case back in October.
1:58.1	And so where the case boils down to is, was that proper?
2:02.1	Did she exceed her authority? Should a judge be allowed to get in between a person and his
2:10.8	attorney? So this...
2:13.0	And is that what happened here?
2:15.0	Is that what happened here?
2:18.0	So the hearing was at the Supreme Court of Indiana today and I think the first thing worth
2:24.8	pointing out is the very obvious point that this is a very different type of
2:30.4	court and environment than what we've been used to in the past.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from MurderSheet, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of MurderSheet and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.