Welcome back. I hope you had a good lunch and a good morning and we are ready to pick it back up this afternoon.

And we kick off the rest of the day with our next speaker, Iver Cummins. I'll have to say it's fantastic to be here and huge thanks to

Vilum and all the team to invite me here and it's great to be with like-minded

critical thinkers at home that's not always the

case so today I want to go through actually you'll see the date September 8th 2020 and this is a viral

update in which I gave a lot of predictions and I explained a lot of the viral vectors of what was going on in COVID. But interestingly,

the New York Times saw fit to do a hit piece on me two weeks later. So Irish guy in the New York

Times, they hit Trump and then they followed on to me. But the funny thing was they questioned

everything very carefully and to avoid defamation.

And they didn't really say a huge amount. They just questioned.

So I'm going to go through what was in that video briefly on all the major points

and then look back over two years and say, well, was I correct or not?

Which in the sense is, were we correct or not?

So one thing I called out was the Gumpurts curve.

I had interviewed Professor Michael Levitt, the Nobel Prize winner, and he had clearly called

out Gumpurts behavior, not in all regions of the world, you know, because viral dynamics

are complex, but showed that, and you can see in Europe here in my first slide,

clearly Gumperts across the board. And Sweden's in there as well, Sweden with no lockdown,

no masks and kids up to 16 in school throughout, and you can see there was no difference.

So they questioned it, but it's apparent. I also included slides.

These are German from the 1918 flu and look familiar.

Yeah, same gumpurts curve.

...