Look at the Obama years, for example. Look at how Trump even got in this position. Look

at all the various institutional heads who abused their positions in power, where this

line between lobbying and treason became increasingly blurry and classified information

and documents became a kind of global currency. And people are so wrapped up in the physical,

printed, tangible materials that I think they forget that a greater and easier threat

is digital media, digital materials. People were rightfully upset about Snowden, you know,

and then of course there are prior cases with WikiLeaks and with Chelsea Manning, you

know, and people were not as upset about that because, I mean, a lot of some people were

obviously, the government was very upset about it. But, you know, we know that a lot of

the reason that people were looking for those documents was because of the unpunished war

crimes of the Bush administration and this broader desire for transparency. And so what

we have now is like the worst of all worlds where we don't have the kind of transparency

about state crimes and state corruption that was sought, you know, 15, 10 years ago. But

we also don't have any security. We don't have safety. We are under threat both from within

and from abroad. And there aren't clear answers to these questions because yes, of course

there's a protocol, there's skiffs, there's consequences that you're supposed to face

for these actions. And no one is facing them, you know, to me, it looks like they're trying

to streamline this as normal behavior. And you know, who does that benefit the most Trump,

obviously, if the Biden crowd is going to be like, Oh, you know, this is nothing. Everybody

does it. Like they need to come up with something better than that. They need to make clear

the differences between the cases, both in terms of what was taken, how it was taken

for what purpose by whom. But there needs to be standards about how this is done. And

...