What can a breakpoint, a daily look and an ever-changing culture through the lens of

unchanging truth?

For the Colston Center, I'm John Stone Street.

A few days ago, David Von Dreyley of the Washington Post scolded pro-ers for allowing what he called the zealots to take over their movement after winning the victory of overturning Row v. Wade.

In the article he compared ProLifers to get this, the Khmer Rouge of 1970s Cambodia, which after its victory began murdering its own members for trivial offenses.

You see in Von Drelli's mind, ProLifers who are now calling attention to the many ethical problems with And

Drelli's mind ProLifers who are now calling attention to the many ethical problems with IVF

are just doing the same thing, allowing the counterproductive radicals

to take over the movement in the wake of a victory.

On a side note, his claim that ProLifers are a flame with their success

makes me wonder if he's actually spoken to ProLifers lately.

The ProLife leaders I know

are in a pretty glum mood

all trying to figure out what we can do after numerous defeats at the ballot box.

Still, the irony here is that there is a kind of radical overreach that Van Drelly is talking about,

but it's not happening in the Pro Life Movement.

His analysis far more closely describes another major political movement, one that not too long

ago also won a decisive victory at the Supreme Court.

You see in the years since the court redefined marriage at the Supreme Court. You see in the year since, the court redefined marriage

for the whole country in 2015 in Obergefeldby Hodges.

The LGBTQ movement has been overtaken

by its most radical wing,

...