4.4 • 785 Ratings
🗓️ 30 January 2019
⏱️ 40 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
In this week's books podcast Sam is joined by Josh Cohen, author of the Not Working: Why We Have To Stop. Josh is a literary critic and a working psychoanalyst, and his book is a thoughtful and subtle discussion of the way in which work dominates not only our lives and identities but our leisure time too -- and a speculation about some of the ways we might set about changing that. His references range from Max Weber and Freud to Orson Welles, Andy Warhol, Emily Dickinson and David Foster Wallace. Is it all the fault of "late capitalism"? Has the digital age made quiet contemplation impossible? And why, Sam queried, does his eccentric list of great idlers include some of the most insanely productive people in history?
Presented by Sam Leith.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This is Spectator Radio and you're listening to The Books Podcast with Sam Leith. |
0:10.8 | Hello and welcome to The Spectator's Books podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor of The Spectator. |
0:16.0 | This week I'm very pleased to be joined by Josh Cohen, who is a literary critic and a psychoanalyst, whose book is called |
0:23.3 | Not Working Why We Have to Stop. And it's a kind of very thoughtful blend of memoir and literary |
0:30.8 | analysis and literary history and psychoanalytic theory about work. Why we're doing too much of it and why when we're not doing it, |
0:40.2 | we're not not doing it right, if I hope that's a roughly fair summation. |
0:45.7 | Josh, can you sort of start by talking a bit about the germ of this book? |
0:49.9 | Because it feels like it could have come out of your experience in the consulting room |
0:54.5 | or it could have come out of, you know, your own experience of staring out of the window. |
0:59.8 | Yeah, I think there are a number of different sources. |
1:02.2 | And actually, I think the first one, which I suppose is nicely constant with the way that a book coming out of psychoanalysis should be is probably my |
1:12.2 | childhood where really my abiding memory is of being told perpetually in the home and particularly |
1:20.7 | at school that I was hopelessly dreamy sluggish and sort of unavailable to the call of urgency. |
1:31.2 | I remember particularly memorably one report telling my parents that I had no sense of urgency. |
1:40.0 | And I think it's that sense of being persecuted, really, by a regime that seemed to assume that very quick, almost stimulus response to whatever was being asked of you. |
1:58.7 | A kind of short circuit of thinking, of reflection, of anything that might stand in the way |
2:05.7 | of the request and its execution was, if not outlawed, then certainly disapproved of. |
2:14.3 | And that seemed to me to run against the grain of really who I was without of course |
2:19.7 | being able to articulate it that clearly to myself but you describe the introduction how you know |
2:26.4 | as your clients come in very often you're seeing as they're anxious about work they're |
2:34.0 | defining themselves through work, |
2:36.1 | but also that, you know, the consulting room becomes a sort of tentatively safe, you know, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.