4.4 • 785 Ratings
🗓️ 31 January 2019
⏱️ 33 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
This week, May prepares for her last shot with Brussels, but can she get what she wants (0:35)? We also talk to Stephen Gibbs, a journalist on the ground in Caracas, about the nightmare in Venezuela (14:30). And last, we take a look at another big issue of the day - are induction hobs simply reinventing the wheel (25:35)?
With James Forsyth, Peter Foster, Stephen Gibbs, Joanna Rossiter, Ysenda Maxtone Graham and James Ramsden.
Presented by Isabel Hardman.
Produced by Cindy Yu and Siva Thangarajah.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This is Spectator Radio and you're listening to The Spectator podcast with Isabel Hardman. |
0:10.3 | Hello and welcome to The Spectator podcast. I'm Isabel Hardman. This week, Theresa May prepares for her |
0:16.9 | last shot with Brussels, but can she get what she wants? I also talk to Stephen Gibbs, |
0:22.7 | a journalist on the ground in Caracas, about the nightmare in Venezuela. And finally, |
0:28.0 | we take a look at another big issue of the day, our induction hobbs simply reinventing the wheel. |
0:34.8 | Now with this week's votes in Parliament, Theresa May has been given one last chance to save |
0:38.9 | her version of Brexit. But will she succeed? James Forsythe writes in his cover article this week that |
0:45.1 | there is a slither of hope. The EU might budge, and even Labour MPs might be one on side. James |
0:51.1 | joins me now together with Peter Foster, the Telegraph's Europe editor from Brussels. |
0:56.3 | So James, just explain to us where we are after this week's votes. |
1:00.7 | This week has been a remarkable week because when Theresa May came back of her deal, |
1:04.7 | she made a massive point that this was the best deal, the only deal negotiable essentially, |
1:09.1 | then it wasn't going to get better than this. |
1:11.1 | She has now been forced to eat her words by Parliament. She is now saying she's going to go back |
1:15.8 | and replace the back, try and replace the backstop with alternative arrangements in inverted |
1:20.0 | commerce. And I think this is a sign of her predicament that this is considered a triumph |
1:23.8 | because this is undoubtedly better for her than what the alternative was earlier |
1:28.3 | in the week because if the Brady Amendment had failed, it would suggest that there was no majority |
1:32.8 | via her own party and her confidence and supply partners for anything at all. And if the Cooper |
1:38.9 | Amendment had passed, it would have by essentially saying that Parliament will never allow |
1:43.3 | no deal to happen. It would have removed whatever negotiating leverage she has with the EU. |
1:48.6 | This worry about what no deal might mean would have gone because it would have been clear that Parliament would never allow the government to go down that path. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.