Skeptics Respond To The Evidence For The Resurrection of Jesus

BibleThinker

Mike Winger

Christianity, Religion & Spirituality

4.8 • 2.6K Ratings

🗓️ 27 March 2018

⏱️ 56 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Here's some links you may want... My full presentation on the resurrection of Jesus - CLICK HERE A lot of good stuff on the evidence for the resurrection - CLICK HERE Some of the debates or other vids that I watched where you can hear the skeptics react to the evidence... Dan Barker Matt Dillahunty Sam Harris Bart Ehrman How do skeptics respond to the evidential case for the resurrection of Jesus? We will look at Bart Ehrman, Dan Barker, Richard Carrier, Sam Harris, Dan Barker, and Matt Dillahunty. If you pay attention to what these guys say then you can see that they don't actually try to come up with reasonable explanations of the evidence. Instead, they tend to attack the idea of miracles or say that belief in the resurrection is the same as belief in some other miracle claims which don't have evidence like the resurrection does. I find these tactics very revealing.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	not just
0:02.0	evidence for the resurrection of Jesus, but I want to talk about how skeptics
0:04.0	react and respond to that evidence,
0:06.0	specifically how they dodge that evidence.
0:09.0	So I'm Mike Winger and welcome to the Tuesday live stream.
0:12.0	This is a weekly live stream every Tuesday.
0:14.8	Almost, oh, there we go. Almost every Tuesday.
0:18.8	Almost every Tuesday. In fact, next week we won't be doing it, but where we deal with issues of theology and
0:24.2	apologetics and we tackle those issues and we try to think our way through them
0:28.2	and we sort of plod through them and basically we're building up the Christian
0:31.7	worldview where we're asking ourselves to love
0:34.2	God with all of our minds and so here's the setup as I explain because I always like to
0:39.4	start my videos by just telling you exactly what we're going to do before we do it. So here's what we're going to do.
0:45.2	We're going to give you a very brief summarized version of the case or the evidence for the
0:50.8	resurrection of Jesus, some of the evidence, not all of it.
0:54.0	Then we're going to jump right into how skeptics respond to that evidence, how skeptics react to that evidence,
1:00.0	because it's in hearing their responses that you start to realize how good the evidence actually is.
1:06.0	And I'm going to talk about specific skeptics. So we're going to deal with like Matt Billahunti, David Hume,
1:10.0	Sam Harris, Dan Barker, let's see we'll do with Richard Carrier, and Bart Ehrman as well.
1:19.8	So a bunch of guys will talk about specific skeptics, All those guys that I just mentioned are atheists or atheist leaning.
1:26.0	And here's why I'm doing this. Every year, and I mean every year we get junk on TV and on social media and in newspapers and articles and all this
1:39.3	that is based on horrible, pathetic, laughable scholarship that's meant to attack the resurrection of Christ.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mike Winger, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mike Winger and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.