Security program on spreadsheets. New regulations piling up? An audit dread. It's time for Vanta.

Vanta automates security and compliance, brings evidence into one place and cuts audit prep by 82%. Less manual work, clear a visibility, faster deals, zero chaos.

Call it compliance or call it Calm appliance. Get it.

Join the 15,000 companies using Vanta to prove trust.

Get started at vanta.com slash calm.

Fans are flocking to see the new biopic about Michael Jackson playing in theaters.

Many still see Michael as the icon they grew up with, whose music means the world to them.

And that's despite the unsettling criminal allegations that were levied against him.

The new film is being dismissed by critics.

They don't like it,

but audiences seem to love taking this brief trip back in time when it felt a lot less complicated

to love Michael's music. Well, this all reminded us of an excellent debate we did a few years back

about whether art can truly be separated from the artist. So we're going to share that conversation

again, where Michael Jackson,

along with some other celebrities, are among the examples brought up by our debaters.

Have you had this experience? There is a comedian that you just idolize, or a singer, or an actor,

or a painter, or a writer, or a composer, somebody whose work you consider to be just totally

amazing, full of insight and beauty and maybe even genius. And then you find out this person

that you idolize is a total jerk or worse, you know, believes in some really bad ideas or has

said some really hurtful things or done some really

harmful things. Do you downgrade your estimation of it because your opinion of the artist has fallen?

Or do we, as a culture, still find a way to admire and honor the work apart from the person who made it?

...