So I think it's pretty intuitive the transition from novice to intermediate programming,

just manipulating one variable at a time.

But I'm not sure how that same logic applies to transitioning

to more advanced programming. Exactly the same, actually. Not everybody will go through this

exact progression, but it will look very similar for everyone. And here's what we note. Like,

I would challenge you to find somebody who wouldn't go through this,

who wouldn't make tremendous progress going through disprogression.

LP three days a week, which will eventually make

minimum effective dose kind of single pieces of complexity changes or change a single

variable until you get to a heavy light medium type of training which Texas

method also is right you with me after that lecture so Texas method heavy light

medium or the same style of program just a little bit different but as far as

the style it's the same sort of thing where you make in progress once a week where you're making that same three days a week full body

training and you're making progress every two weeks right you're hitting new

PRs every other week and then you're hitting PRs every third week and eventually

you go to the point where you split to a four-day split program and you're

probably going two upper days two lower body days in in a four-day split program, and you're probably going two upper days,

two lower-body days in a four-day split,

which may still continue,

sort of a Texas method, heavy-light medium sort of layout.

And then at some point, you can't drive the intensity up enough anymore,

and you have to start adding in volume, which you can do via both reps and sets. Most of us, I think most of us would agree that adding more sets to get your volume up will carry over better for strength.

...