meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

Sabine Hossenfelder LOOK FOR INCONSISTENCY! ​(#198)

Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

Brian Keating

Science, Physics, Natural Sciences

4.71.1K Ratings

🗓️ 30 November 2021

⏱️ 73 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sabine Hossenfelder has a PhD in physics and is presently a Research Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS). Sabine works on physics beyond the standard model, phenomenological quantum gravity, and modifications of general relativity. Hossenfelder has also been researching since at least 2008 on how technology is changing researchers' ability to publicize, discuss, or publish their research, when she co-organized the Science in the 21st Century workshop. She has written more than 70 research articles, mostly dedicated to quantum gravity and physics beyond the standard model. In her channel "Science without the gobbledygook," Sabine talks straight about science: No hype, no spin, no tip-toeing around inconvenient truths. New video each Saturday. Hossenfelder's first book, Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray, released in June 2018. A review in Nature described it as "provocative", and Frank Wilczek recommended it as an "intensely personal and intellectually hard-edged" book. https://www.youtube.com/c/SabineHossenfelder Sabine blogs at backreaction.blogspot.com Audible is hands-down my favorite platform for consuming podcasts, fiction and nonfiction books! With an Audible membership, you can download titles and listen offline, anytime, anywhere. The Audible app is free and can be installed on all smartphones and tablets. You can listen across devices without losing your spot. Audible members don’t have to worry about using their credits right away. You can keep your credits for up to a year—and use them to binge on a whole series if you’d like! And if you’re not loving your selection, you can simply swap it for another.Start your free 30-day trial today: Audible.com/impossible or text “impossible” to 500-500 00:00:00 Intro 00:00:59 Is philosophy dangerous for physicists? 00:02:22 Is there more "hype" in physics than in other sciences? 00:04:23 What do you think of the optimism aimed at future experiments such as LISA? 00:07:42 How did you arrive at the conclusions you did on your most recent paper without knowing initial conditions? 00:11:30 What if James Cleark Maxwell could tweet? Would he have been discredited? 00:13:42 Why is there so much attention on UFOs ? Is it just bayesian inference? 00:16:00 What visual evidence counts as data? Especially where UFOs are concerned? 00:17:30 Can you reiterate your thoughts on the mulitiverse theory and its' relationship to dogma? 00:24:15 What do you think of string theories claims to explain so much with so little evidence, leaving it to others to measure initial and boundary conditions? 00:29:20 You're a critic of big experiments. Where do you think physics is going/should go? 00:35:40 How did you become a youtube science star? 59:50:00 What do you think of the doctrine of "fine-tuning" of the Universe? 📺 Watch my most popular videos:📺 Frank Wilczek https://youtu.be/3z8RqKMQHe0?sub_confirmation=1 Weinstein and Wolfram https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI0AZ4Y4Ip4?sub_confirmation=1 Sheldon Glashow: https://youtu.be/a0_iaWgxQtA?sub_confirmation=1 Sir Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize winner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMuqyAvX7Wo?sub_confirmation=1 Jill Tarter https://youtu.be/O9K9OBd3vHk?sub_confirmation=1 Sara Seager Venus LIfe: https://youtu.be/QPsEDoOTU6k?sub_confirmation=1 Please join my mailing list; just click here: http://briankeating.com/mailing_list.php Please contact [email protected] to sponsor the show. Be my friend: 🏄‍♂️ Twitter: https://twitter.com/DrBrianKeating 🔔 Subscribe https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1 ✍️Detailed Blog posts here: https://briankeating.com/blog.php 🎙️Listen on audio-only platforms: https://briankeating.com/podcast.php A production of http://imagination.ucsd.edu/ Support the podcast: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating Produced by Brian Keating and Stuart Volkow P.G.A Music by https://yetitears.myportfolio.com/, Theo Ryan _ http://the-omusic.com/) Story Blocks Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Some upbeat music to start what will undoubtedly be an upbeat episode of the

0:20.1

Into the Impossible Podcast with my friend, my YouTube mentor, Dr. Sabina

0:26.8

Haasenfeldr joining us all the way from Germany.

0:30.0

Sabina, how are you doing today, Doctor?

0:34.0

I'm great. Good to see you, Brian.

0:36.0

It's good to see you.

0:37.0

I see you every Saturday night here.

0:39.0

I don't watch, you know, internet on the Sabbath, which we'll get into but there's so much that's been going on since you made your last appearance and I can't tell if you are

0:50.7

Getting more optimistic about physics more pessimistic about physics, more pessimistic about physics, or more of the same.

0:56.6

What do you think about philosophy and is it dangerous for physicists to engage in it?

1:02.0

Well, it depends on what you mean with dangerous. So is it is a dangerous

1:10.0

career-wise? Probably yes, because as you say a lot of physicists are quite skeptical that it's worth the time.

1:20.1

So if you spend a lot of your time on philosophy they would consider it a waste of time and that's not good if you want to get ahead in your job

1:31.4

But personally I would say every good scientist, not necessarily physicist, but scientists in general,

1:39.0

needs a solid philosophical background just to understand how science works in the first place.

1:46.0

So I really think you can't do without.

1:49.8

And if you don't have those bases, it comes back to haunt you because you'll be confusing

1:56.8

what you actually know with what you just believe.

2:02.0

What do you make about the upsurge or the propensity that physicists have for hype compared to the other sciences?

2:11.0

Do you think physicists height potential results or you know

2:16.0

newfound discoveries more than another fields for example like biology or

2:21.7

chemistry? Well I think it really depends very strongly on the field so if you're looking at the foundations of physics I dare to say the answer is probably yes, especially if you compare it with fields

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Brian Keating, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Brian Keating and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.