S6 Ep22: Rule 610
Truth & Justice with Bob Ruff
Bob Ruff
4.5 • 7.8K Ratings
🗓️ 13 January 2019
⏱️ 40 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
We're still working on building the Jim Melgar reward fund. Please consider donating here: www.GoFundMe.com/JimMelgar
Listen ad-free by joining our Patreon!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | after the |
| 0:24.6 | to |
| 0:28.3 | last week we broke down max ccress argument to the court of appeals claiming |
| 0:49.2 | that sandy melgar's jury voted to convict her of murder without legally |
| 0:53.7 | sufficient evidence. the insufficiency argument was cited as point of air number |
| 0:57.9 | one in the appeal brief as a quick recap max contention is that the entirety |
| 1:02.9 | of the evidence presented by the prosecution of trial did not meet the legal |
| 1:06.9 | standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was based on |
| 1:10.6 | speculation and probability rather than a factual analysis of the evidence. |
| 1:14.9 | as I stated last week I believe that ccress claim was all but proven by the |
| 1:19.9 | jury foreman who has gone on record to say that the verdict was based on his |
| 1:23.7 | assessment that the prosecutors theory made the most sense but moving past |
| 1:31.2 | that argument in today's episode we're going to be discussing point of error |
| 1:35.6 | number two from the appellate brief. |
| 1:43.7 | Texas Ranger James Holland is a legendary interrogator they call him the |
| 1:48.1 | serial killer whisperer. you can't hide those indications and that's why yesterday |
| 1:52.4 | I knew that you did it. but now shocking interrogation tapes reveal how the |
| 1:56.4 | super cop really operates and that's why they ask me to come in because I'm |
| 2:00.2 | special. from something else the Marshall project and Sony Music Entertainment |
| 2:04.3 | this is smoke screen just say you're sorry. listen and follow on Apple podcast |
| 2:10.0 | Spotify Amazon Music Stitcher or wherever you get your podcast. |
| 2:23.4 | in the appeal brief point of error number two is stated as follows. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Bob Ruff, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Bob Ruff and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

