This is

CBSI and the World. I'm John Bachelor with Joseph Umar.

My good colleague, he's traveling. He's in Buenos Aires.

He's the executive director of

of security society.

Let me see if I can get this correct, Joseph,

because what we're looking at here is a challenge.

Argentina was the first voice to condemn the July 28th corrupt election in Venezuela,

which denied the opposition transparency at the voting booth

and is now rejected around the world, but especially the U.S. and its European allies, the OAS, I could go on.

Argentina denies Venezuela.

At the same time in the early days Lulidus Silva in

Brasilia and Gustavo Petro and Bogotage you know very well and even Amlo

in Mexico City hedged whether they were going to endorse

Madura for a new term or not knowing that all these voices were being raised

led by Argentina. Now I come to where we are now. Brasilia, Luther Silva, is

recommending there be a new election. To my knowledge, Malay has not changed his

position whatsoever.

The winner, Gonzales is the president.

Madura is probably a criminal, certainly not the president.

So how do you measure all of a sudden the voice of Lula de Silva recommending a new

election? Is this a back down on Lula de Silva's part? Does this give authority

...