meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Briefing with Albert Mohler

Monday, October 28, 2024

The Briefing with Albert Mohler

The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

Commentary, Truth, Christianity, Seminary, God, Preach, Jesus, Scripture, Sbts, Albert, Bible, Culture, 881944, Religion & Spirituality, Mohler, Christ

4.88.4K Ratings

🗓️ 28 October 2024

⏱️ 26 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.

Part I (00:13 - 16:10)
This Just Blew Up the Media World: The Washington Post and LA Times Decline to Endorse a Presidential Candidate for the 2024 Election

Part II (16:10 - 19:31)
Israel Sends a Clear Message to Iran: And the World Waits to See How Iran Will Respond to Israel’s Attack

Part III (19:31 - 25:35)
Canada (And Others) Back Away from Open Border Policies: And the U.S. Needs an Honest Conversation About Immigration Policy




Sign up to receive The Briefing in your inbox every weekday morning.

Follow Dr. Mohler:
X | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube

For more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.
For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.
To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

It's Monday, October 28, 2024.

0:07.0

I'm Albert Moeller, and this is the briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.

0:14.1

For the better course of the last century or so, American newspapers have often offered what

0:19.6

amounts to endorsements in major political races, and that of course would include the biggest

0:24.1

race of them all which is the American presidency but the big news in the last

0:29.2

few days has been that two major newspapers and I I mean two major newspapers, the Los Angeles Times

0:34.7

and the Washington Post, have both announced that they are going to decline to endorse either

0:40.2

candidate in the 2024 presidential election, and both have indicated that it is

0:45.8

their intention that the papers no longer do such endorsements, although the question is

0:50.9

still open as to whether or not both papers will offer some kind of endorsement when it comes to statewide elections or other local matters.

0:59.1

But the fact is this is making big news not only only big news, but big waves. Giant controversy. And of course the expectation

1:06.4

was that both of these liberal papers would endorse the Democratic nominee for President

1:11.2

Kamala Harris. It's actually apparent that Kamala Harris

1:15.0

expected both of these editorial boards to offer their endorsement and one of the

1:20.0

first things I want to say is I'm not sure they would have mattered much anyway, but it

1:24.2

tells you a lot that these endorsements that didn't happen matter a lot to the dominant

1:30.7

media class itself and also to the Democratic nominee for president.

1:35.0

That's the class that's supposed to stick together.

1:38.0

And in this case, not so much.

1:40.0

But you know this raises some massive issues that we get to think about simply because of this controversy.

1:45.0

First of all, what about the editorial board endorsement?

1:49.0

Well, one of the things you need to remember is that the newspaper business as we know it today

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.