meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Mark Levin Podcast

Mark Levin Audio Rewind - 12/1/20

Mark Levin Podcast

Cumulus Podcast Network

News Commentary, Politics, News

4.521.8K Ratings

🗓️ 2 December 2020

⏱️ 117 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On Tuesday's Mark Levin Show, it's clear that the US supreme court is unwilling to act on the constitutional questions regarding the election but we must advocate nonetheless. Everything is on the line and everything is at stake. There is also absolute lawlessness going on in the state of Pennsylvania and their supreme court! Then, the media is focused on President Trump's legal expenses but didn't care when taxpayers were footing the bill for the Mueller witch hunt. The media should be focused on exposing the truth not criticizing the Trump campaign. Later, concerning Attorney General Bill Barr, the US DOJ does not have the foggiest idea if there is election voting fraud or not. The AG relies on the US Attorneys for that and they have been extremely passive. Plus, investigative reporter James O’Keefe, President of Project Veritas, calls in with bombshell recordings from CNN's morning meetings where CEO Jeff Zucker dictates what will and won't be covered in their biased and propagandistic coverage of Trump. Zucker makes it clear that this is a concerted effort to attack Trump from multiple angles and normalize propaganda with CNN's viewers. Afterward, Rep. Rashida Tlaib retweeted a tweet using a phrase often associated with the demise of Jews. Anti-Semites using this phrase have referred to Israel as cancer that must be eliminated. Despite having been criticized for Anti-Semitic remarks in the past, Tlaib has gotten a pass on this trope from her allies in the leftwing media. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College.

0:06.0

Now, in its 175th year, Hillsdale is a truly independent institution, where learning is prized

0:13.0

and intellectual enthusiasm is valued.

0:15.0

Thank you for listening, and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship.

0:20.0

He's here. He's here. Now broadcasting from the underground command post. Deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a non-distrib building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike. Love them.

1:50.0

Hello, America. Mark Lovin, our number 877-381-3811-877-3813811.

2:01.0

It's amazing. Three hours is never enough on this program, and I've got a ton to do today, and I want to bring you your attention.

2:08.0

But sometimes, before I come on this program, even during a time I come on this program, when I have friends and acquaintances email me, I have to scratch my head, I have to shake my head.

2:22.0

Everybody wants to be an analyst. I'm not an analyst. I'm an advocate.

2:32.0

We have people, friends, mine, lawyers who are out there predicting.

2:38.0

I don't think the Supreme Court is going to take that. I'm very pessimistic about that case, and so forth. I'm sitting here. Well, what case would you be optimistic about? This is an uphill battle.

2:48.0

It's obvious from the Supreme Court's conduct the last five weeks that it has absolutely no interest so far in ruling on any of the cases, including the one that's been before it for at least a month regarding Article 2.

3:01.0

And while there is State Court, can rewrite a state election law, eviscerating the Article 2 of the Constitution and undermining a state legislature.

3:13.0

It's not a matter of whether you're optimistic or pessimistic, so you can write another blog point and say, look at me, I was right.

3:20.0

Or as I said last week, what is the point of this? What is the point of it?

3:28.0

I don't get it. Everything's on the line. Everything's at stake.

3:36.0

It's the difference between analysts and advocates.

3:41.0

People who take what's going on in this country, very, very seriously, and want to defeat it, and want to push back.

3:49.0

First is people who are commenting on it or observing it. And they feel the need to tell me. Well, don't tell me.

4:04.0

This case, it's been brought in Pennsylvania that I talked about at length yesterday. And Daniel Horowitz has a great piece up at the blaze, and I've posted that and linked to that as well.

4:19.0

Should be a slam dunk case.

4:22.0

The Commonwealth's judge got it exactly right. She issues a temporary injunction, wants to have a hearing, says it's likely the plaintiffs are going to win on the merits.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cumulus Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cumulus Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.