Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College.

Now, in its 175th year, Hillsdale is a truly independent institution, where learning is prized

and intellectual enthusiasm is valued.

Thank you for listening, and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship.

He's here. He's here. Now broadcasting from the underground command post. Deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a non-distrib building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike. Love them.

America, Mark Levin, our numbers, 877-38138-1187-38138-11. This is one of those shows.

I think you want to listen for three hours, because in the face of the juggernaut would have, which would have us put this election behind us, I'm going to fight those headwinds.

National review, which has lost much of not most of its appeal to many of us, is an unsigned editorial today entitled Trump's Disgraceful Endgame.

They have legal writers over there who are utterly unencumbered with the Constitution, the law and the facts.

Legal analysts all over TV is usual, who do not have the background, the education, or the experience to be discussing these matters in any significant way.

And they're not alone. You have these serious, serious studies and analyses by highly competent and reputable individuals who are never interviewed and their work

is never discussed in big media and on much of conservative media, the never-trumper media in particular.

They don't challenge the specific of the studies and the statistics that are presented.

They just join the gaggle of howling coyotes out there who demand an end to all this.

This will not end in this election, it will not end in the next election, it will not end in the election after that.

If we do not return to a lawful and constitutional voting process.

And I want to address this in a number of ways. I want to take one of the cases as an example, Pennsylvania case I'm very, very familiar with.

Now let me keep it as simple as I know how. Under the Pennsylvania Constitution. Under the Pennsylvania Constitution.

You can only change the voting system by constitutional women. I heard my friend, brilliant man, professor John Eastman on a local show in Washington to say, well, he's arguing there's an inherent power worry.

State legislature has the power to change the voting processes. That's not correct with all due respect.

That's not what the Pennsylvania Constitution says. We're not talking about inherent authority to delegate or to pass statutes. We're talking about fundamental law here.

And what the state constitution specifically says. Now, the Constitution of Pennsylvania is the supreme law of Pennsylvania.

...