Karen Read's Oral Arguments for Motion to Dismiss: All Roads Lead to Trooper Proctor

The Emily Show

Baker Media, LLC.

True Crime, Entertainment News, News

4.9 • 1.9K Ratings

🗓️ 7 March 2025

⏱️ 20 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On March 5th, 2025, Karen Read had a Hearing for the Motions to Dismiss. The ongoing debate about the Sallyport videos: Are they exculpatory? Why were they not disclosed earlier? And where are the missing portions of the footage?

Note from Canton Police Chief: "That is how it records, LOL. No Tampering."

Getting an Evidentiary Hearing is the best outcome to clarify what happened to the videos and who was involved. This can lead to the case being dismissed or provide grounds for appeal. Judge Cannone has to determine if the videos are exculpatory. If not, an evidentiary hearing will likely not be granted.

In the first trial, someone told Lieutenant Fanning that there were rumors that a juror was expressing opinions about the trial. The juror denied it but was removed anyways. The defense wants to know who told Fanning about the rumors and how they knew to contact him.

Karen Read will be back in court on Tuesday, March 18th, 2025.

Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/DspEzUu2lGM

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Welcome back. It's time for a quick bit clip. The full episode will be linked in the description, but this is the quick bit clip to keep you in the loop for everything that's happening on the live stream channel. Let's get into it.
0:14.3	It's what day is it? March 5th. We are back in court today for the Commonwealth versus Karen Reid. There was much scheduling discussion
0:23.1	at the end of the day yesterday about when argument was going to be in the motion to dismiss.
0:27.6	And argument for the motion to dismiss is going to be today. As we got to the lunch break,
0:32.1	we have learned new information. And that new information includes that there was an October report from
0:39.7	Trooper Buchanek that indicated that in May, 24, during the last trial, he was reviewing
0:48.4	video with ADA Lally. But the video, or at least some of the video he was reviewing, were not turned over to the
0:58.6	defense until October of 2024. So it was reviewed in May during trial and wasn't turned
1:06.5	over to some five months later. What? We've also heard that the inverted camera,
1:13.5	because apparently it was a defective camera
1:15.3	from the inverted video,
1:17.3	was removed and disposed of
1:20.7	sometime between January 29th, 2020,
1:24.1	and July of 2024.
1:28.3	So no one can even examine what was defective about the camera to make that shit flipped.
1:38.5	But it would make logical sense, which is not what the defense should have to go on.
1:44.0	They should have the physical on. They should have
1:44.6	the physical evidence. So should the Commonwealth. If the camera internal components or lens or
1:50.2	whatever was recording things inverted, that would be a reasonable explanation for why the video
1:56.8	was inverted, but the timestamp wasn't. You know what could answer that question?
2:08.3	Having the camera. I bet somebody could like look at it and tell you. Or you could bring in someone from the manufacturer to explain. There's a lot of ways you can do that if you have it.
2:13.5	But if it's been disposed of, there's nothing you can evaluate, like the metadata.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.