All right. So Dr. Fauci, also known as the science, testified before Congress once again.

And what we're going to go through today is kind of all the top talking points.

Like what actually happened, what was said, what was actually meaningful to all of this.

The other thing that we're going to try to do here is we're actually going to do a steel man argument for Fauci.

So we're essentially going to say, look,

at certain stages of the pandemic, this is what he knew or maybe he didn't know, this is what he

was dealing with. These were the instructions that he gave. This might have been the reasons why.

So we're going to do all of that to try to put this on just a good objective playing field so

that we're not just sitting here bashing him because as anybody this watches for a while knows that we're not just sitting here, you know, bashing him

because as anybody that has watched us for a while knows that we're not big fans of the way Fauci

handled the pandemic. But we also want to be intellectually honest with all of this. So we're going

to attempt to do that. We're going to show you some highlights. We're also going to do some

analysis to determine whether or not some of the things that were said during the testimony were actually accurate. In the end, we're going to go ahead and try to come up with some

sort of semi-comprehensive conclusion on what this testimony actually achieved and where

we should go from here. All of that and more coming up on this episode of making the argument

brought to you by Good ranchers. I am,

I, of course,

am your host,

Nick Fradis,

with me in the studio is my beautiful bright Tina,

Queen of the Bees.

Hello,

...