meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Election Profit Makers

Episode 8: Episode 7 (Special press conference)

Election Profit Makers

Jon Kimball & David Rees

Comedy, News, Politics

4.9700 Ratings

🗓️ 10 September 2016

⏱️ 38 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Jon gives his first press conference in 16,000 days. Starlee asks some tough questions. David wonders if he pumped and dumped a big contract.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you.

0:03.0

So it's been 235 days since Crooked Hillary Clinton has had a press conference.

0:12.0

And you as reporters who give her all of these glowing reports should ask yourselves why.

0:19.0

And I'll tell you why, because she's been a mess.

0:25.1

235 days, no news conference for Hillary Clinton. Just ask yourself why she doesn't have

0:33.7

news conferences. Welcome to election profit makers, a guide to winning and losing money on the 2016 campaign using online prediction markets.

0:42.3

Today's date is Friday, September 9th.

0:44.6

This is the 7th of 17th episodes in our series, and this is a very special edition of election profit makers.

0:51.3

As many of you know, it's been over 16,000 days since John Kimball held his last

0:55.5

press conference, and today we aim to make things right. Ladies and gentlemen, the original

1:00.5

election profit maker, John Kimball.

1:03.7

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. It's me, John Kimball. Welcome to my press conference. I'm

1:09.1

looking forward to answering any questions you might have.

1:11.9

Yes, David Rees from electionprofitmakers.com. On Wednesday, Clinton and Trump participated in NBC's

1:17.7

wonderful commander-in-chief forum, which was moderated by Matt Lauer, who, as you know, is an

1:22.9

incredibly talented and serious journalist. How are the candidates' performances in that form influencing your

1:28.7

approach to betting on the upcoming debate-related markets on predicted? That's a great question,

1:33.5

David. You know, after watching that debate, I thought that we would be seeing more of the same

1:40.1

in the upcoming debates, a lot of bad questions and not much rebuttal from the moderators.

1:46.4

But I'm now thinking that because Lauer performed so terribly and has been taken through the

1:55.2

ringer by many of his media pals out there, I think there could be an overcorrection in the coming debates,

2:03.6

where moderators are actually a lot tougher. So from that aspect, I think it's more likely

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jon Kimball & David Rees, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jon Kimball & David Rees and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.