This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

Slack.com slash DHQ. The New York Times, a former newspaper, has published a bombshell

report that may be the smoking gun that finally gets to the bottom of the tipping point.

The front-page story claims, and as God is my witness, I'm not making this up, that

unnamed sources with unknown relationships to unnamed investigators on the Mueller team

made unsubstantiated claims that the unnamed investigators made unspecified complaints about

the Attorney General's description of the Mueller report, but they won't say what those

complaints are. Again, not making this up. The Times ran the story under the headline,

some on Mueller's team say report was more damaging than Barr revealed, and claims the

unnamed government officials are familiar with the quote, simmering frustrations of the

unnamed investigators. They heard say these things, which they won't tell us what they

were. Three reporters have bylines on this story, and two other reporters are credited

with additional reporting. By my count, that means it took five reporters to gather the information

that unnamed people heard unnamed people make unspecified claims. Sounds like another Times

Pulitzer, maybe already in the mail. Times editor, blithering provocation method, had high

praise for his crack team of five reporters who ran down these anonymous sources, who overheard

other anonymous sources say something they won't tell us. In a statement released to a really

outraged woman in a Brooklyn artisanal coffee shop, Mr. Third said, quote, this bombshell could

...