The New York Times, a former newspaper, has released a major new report on the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign.

The Times report proves conclusively that the investigation into Russian collusion was not a witch hunt,

but merely a search for warding nosewomen and peaked black hats who fly on broomsticks.

And may have colluded with Russia.

The Times says the FBI did not have a spy within the Trump campaign,

but merely an informant who secretly kept watch over the campaign and then reported back to the FBI in a non-spine sort of way.

Further, the Times reports that when FBI agent Peter Struck wanted an insurance policy in case Trump got elected,

he was not referring to the investigation, but rather to some other insurance policy.

Maybe fire insurance or something for the car, something like that.

Finally, the Times reassured its readers that the paper includes all the news that's fit to print.

If by news you mean blithering attempts to keep from exposing the corruption of the Obama administration,

and by fit to print you mean not.

Trick or warning, I'm Andrew Clayman, and this is the Andrew Clayman Show.

All right, we have Nadine Strassen with us today.

She was just reviewed today.

She was reviewed in the Wall Street Journal.

That is why the show is so prescient.

It makes me want to go look up the word prescient and find out what it means and what I'm talking about.

No, she wrote this book, Hate Why We Should Resist It With Free Speech, not censorship.

She is not particularly a conservative, but she is a true friend of free speech,

which makes her a true friend of the show.

And it's a really good interview.

...