This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

Slack.com slash DHQ. A study from Brunel University, London, has found that physically weaker

men are more likely than physically strong men to be attracted to socialism. This is a

real study which actually confirms the findings of a previous study from Denmark. The Brunel

academic study, 171 men, aged 18 to 40, and found those who favored socialism tended to

be what in scientific terminology are usually referred to as weaklings, or wimps, or milk

toasts, or panty wastes, or pansies, or sissies, or whooses, or doormats, or wimps. Maybe

I said wimps already. Conversely, men who supported capitalism tended to be physically stronger

and to kick sand in the faces of men who supported socialism and then drive away in their far

larger cars, with their much prettier and more sexually satisfied wives. Once the stronger

capitalist men were out of sight, the socialist men tended to stick their tongues out at them,

and then go home sniffling with grimy tear-stained faces and hiding the attic, pulling the wings

off flies. That's possible I made some of that up. We're probably the part about the

flies. Anyway, the scientist found, and this is true, that men who were more physically

formidable were less likely to support the redistribution of wealth, whether or not they

were themselves wealthy. This may be because weaker men, sometimes referred to as Momma's

boys, or girly men, or cream puffs, realize that the only way they can get their hands

on the wealth of stronger men is by ganging up on them and plundering their honestly-earned

...