You've heard these questions, they're not new, they first arose in the neighborhood of Palmyra,

and they continue in one form or another to the present day.

In the meantime, I have a question. What conceivable historical

or doctrinal or procedural issue that may arise could ever overshadow one's consuming spiritual

conviction.

I'd say 99% ho-ho-oh North of Mormon has as detailed is falsifiable.

How could this be a translation from these whole different language?

You've got crops mentioned in the Book of Orman that never existed in pre-Columbian America.

And we're going to translate it in English and it's going to read just like the EJ's Bible.

If you had iron or steel, you would expect to find these things, even if they were all Russian you still find them they've never been found

ever.

Many of the prophets and apostles have referred to Native Americans from all over north and

South America and to Polynesians for that matter in the Pacific as Lamanites.

Nobody has ever found pre-Cilovian coidage ever.

Anywhere in the new world.

We have no evidence of any significant number of Middle Eastern people entering into Native American population.

If there were coins, they'd be chocolate beans. Why aren't chocolate beans

if the Book of Warm?

Our seven day calendar was totally unknown.

They never had Cherry.

Pig zero.

Not one pig bone has ever showed up

...