Effectively Wild Episode 391: The Best Listener Email Show Since Last Week’s
Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast
Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley
4.7 • 2.7K Ratings
🗓️ 21 February 2014
⏱️ 45 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Ben and Sam answer listener emails about MLB’s blackout policy, the Phillies and the NCAA, missing triples, the save rule, and more.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Good morning and welcome to episode 391 of Effectively Wild, the daily podcast from baseball |
| 0:28.1 | perspective brought to you by the baseballreference.com play index. I'm Ben Lindbergh, joined as always by |
| 0:34.5 | Sam Miller. It's Friday, so we are taking a break from the team previews until next week and doing |
| 0:41.2 | our traditional email show and you all responded with excellent emails as usual. Where would you like to |
| 0:48.5 | begin? So Benjamin says, as someone who might charitable be described as a political operative, |
| 0:56.0 | I spent a lot of time thinking about the composition of committees and elected bodies and how that |
| 0:59.9 | composition affects decision-making. The discussion of the Rockies co-GM situation got me thinking |
| 1:05.8 | about how decision-making could be done differently in front offices, so I thought I'd propose a |
| 1:09.9 | couple scenarios. I was wondering how decision-making in the following scenarios would be similar or |
| 1:15.2 | different to today's model and whether decisions would ultimately be better or worse. Scenario is |
| 1:21.8 | decisions are made by a group of seven co-GMs hired by the team to make decisions. It is |
| 1:27.4 | assumed the skill level of each co-GM individually, roughly mirrors the distribution of talent in |
| 1:32.8 | front offices generally. So essentially, instead of having a GM who makes decisions, you would have a |
| 1:39.8 | body of GMs who would vote like a congress of GMs. And all votes would be weighted equally. |
| 1:48.1 | I'm assuming decisions to trade sign etc are made like they are in a parliamentary setting, |
| 1:52.1 | they need to be proposed by a member of the body and voted on. So what do you think? Would you |
| 1:57.6 | rather have seven GMs who are sort of, I don't well, I mean, keeping each other in check and |
| 2:05.3 | utilizing the wisdom of all seven of them. But, you know, each sort of diluting, the others, |
| 2:12.9 | or would you rather just have the one strong man at the top? |
| 2:18.5 | Well, a lot of teams sort of do have the co-GM thing almost in that there are a lot of front |
| 2:24.9 | offices that have former GMs in senior advisor roles or special assistant roles where they have |
| 2:33.1 | the experience of having been GMs and they come in and give guidance. But they don't vote. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

