The following podcast contains advertising to access an ad-free version of the LawFair

podcast become a material supporter of LawFair at patreon.com slash LawFair.

That's patreon.com slash LawFair.

Also, check out LawFair's other podcast offerings, rational security, chatter, LawFair

no bull and the aftermath.

The paper basically shows that if you analyze what we call the black presenting tweets

that the IRA published on a per-tweet basis, that those tweets were able to pull in more

reactions, that is more retweets, more replies and more likes, than tweets of other assumed

identities that the IRA sort of took on.

And so that is sort of a bit of a hidden finding because if you look at the overall numbers,

accounts that were classified as conservative actually got more total reactions, but that's

only because the volume of tweets by conservative presenting accounts was that much higher.

I'm Quinted Gerritic and this is the LawFair podcast, May 21st, 2020.

This week on our Arbiters of Truth Series on Disinformation, a friend to whack and I spoke

with Dean Freeland, an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, Hussman

School of Journalism and Media.

Dean's work focuses on data science and political expression on social media, and we discussed

research he conducted on tweets from the Internet Research Agency troll farm, and there

attempts to influence US politics, including around the 2016 election.

In a recent article, Dean and his co-authors found that IRA tweets from accounts presenting

themselves as black Americans received particularly high engagement from other users

on Twitter, which raises interesting questions about the interaction of race and disinformation.

...