It seems like the Bitcoin maxes are very anti-core 30 and they're very pro-nots.

What is it that they're not understanding that you do understand?

If you believe that, you know, getting to 50% of the network or whatever is going to stop that

data from propagating, you're just fooling yourself.

And so what I've been telling people for a while now is like, if we want to stop the

spam, you need to get people to use Bitcoin more in the way that you want them to use it. It doesn't

actually really become a legal issue or liability unless you're building additional functionality

that is extracting that data and transforming it into a JPEG that could then be interpreted by a human as that illegal content.

What problem does taking the opereturn from 80 to a, was it 80 bytes to 100 kilobytes?

I think you said.

What problem does that solve?

Hmm. does that solve? Jameson, it's good to see you again.

Long time no see.

Yeah, I think last time we spoke was in person in Nashville, Miami yeah yeah it's been a while a lot has happened

since the last we spoke especially around this whole Bitcoin knots versus core debate debacle

I don't know what it is we've spoken with a couple of people

on the show about it i was just telling you offline like it seems like from a distance that the

community wherever you circumscribe that is siding with knots and then um you know people are on both sides are accusing the other side of

being infiltrated hijacked compromised etc um i don't really have a strong opinion on all of this

i feel like everyone should just run a node and let the market sort it out but i'm hoping that you

can maybe tease

out some of the nuance. And I know you said you've been talking about this for a while. You might

...