Hey folks, as you know, the Supreme Court recently overturned Roe v Wade.

On this episode of the Café Insider Podcast, Joyce Vance and I assess the arguments in the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions.

Meanwhile, many people are wondering what steps the federal government can take to protect abortion rights,

and what the implications are for other constitutional rights, such as the right to use contraceptives, and the right to same-sex marriage.

Joyce and I discuss all of this and more on the Café Insider Podcast.

Today, we're sharing a clip from the episode with listeners of Stay Tuned.

To hear our full conversation, and to access all other Café Insider content, try the membership for just $1 for one month.

You can do that at Café.com slash insider. That's Café.com slash insider.

We look forward to having you as a part of the insider community.

So we've talked about the majority opinion. We've talked about the three concurrences.

What we didn't spend time talking about last Friday in the emergency podcast was the dissent.

And it's all three of the progressive justices wrote one dissent.

That's unusual.

It is. They want to speak with one voice, I think, although it's only three of them, but they spoke together.

And it's pretty strong. It's pretty powerful. What did you think of it?

The dissent is good reading. And it's accessible.

I think the justices wrote this document intentionally, hoping that it would be read by people who were not lawyers.

Because it's it's comprehensible that way. Let me, I mean, really, I wasn't joking when I said I'd like to read the whole thing.

I hope everybody will read it.

Let me just read from the last two paragraphs because they help us understand where this dissent goes.

This is the three justices writing. They say, the justices who wrote those words,

referring to an earlier opinion in Casey, O'Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, they were judges of wisdom.

...