meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

Americano: is Seymour Hersh wrong about the Nord Stream pipelines?

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 5 March 2023

⏱️ 32 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In response to Seymour Hersh's recent appearance on Americano, Freddy speaks with open-source intelligence analyst Oliver Alexander, who unpacks his argument against Hersh's claims about the U.S. blowing up the Nordstream pipeline.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to the Americano podcast, a series of discussions about American power,

0:11.5

politics and society.

0:14.6

On each episode, I will talk to an American expert or an expert on America about something

0:20.6

that's going on in America in

0:22.8

2023. On this episode of Americano, we're going to revisit the subject we covered in the last one,

0:30.1

because in our last podcast, loyal listeners will remember, we had Seymour Hirsch, the American

0:36.3

journalist, talking about his theory,

0:38.8

his piece on Substack, that America took out the Nord Stream pipelines.

0:44.9

There was a fair amount of criticism on Twitter about the podcast, about Seymour Hirsch,

0:50.2

a lot of people calling him a crank and so on, And various people suggesting we got in touch with Oliver Alexander,

0:56.7

who has been doing a lot of work debunking Seymour Hershey's thesis.

1:01.4

And he joins me now.

1:02.7

Oliver, thank you very much for coming on.

1:04.8

And thanks for having me.

1:05.8

I should introduce you.

1:06.6

You are an open source intelligence analyst based in Denmark.

1:14.0

And before we get on to the Seymour Hirsch debunking, can I just ask you what's your working theory? I know it's changed a little bit

1:18.8

recently, but what's your working theory as to what happened to the Nord Stream pipelines?

1:24.4

It's hard to say. I don't have like a conclusive theory because I have circumstantial evidence that suggests

1:29.5

that possibly Russia was involved.

1:32.4

That's where my circumstantial evidence points.

1:34.5

They had motive to do this through some contract negotiations in regards to Nord Stream

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.