Hey, hey, good afternoon.

Everybody, hope you're doing well.

Stefan Mollini from Freedom, sorry for the slightly late start, and to see if you can figure

out whether I came up with the name of the stream while either A, having my glasses on,

or B, not having my glasses on. I think, I think it's fairly, I think it's

fairly clear. All right. So we've got some stuff to talk about today. I got some Bitcoin

information to get across to you. But we have somebody who wants to talk, Edwardo.

If you want to tell me what's on your mind, I'd love to hear.

Hey there, good afternoon.

How are you doing?

Doing all right.

I made sure to request early because I was sure there would be a lot of requests,

but thanks for bringing me on. So, yeah, I was thinking about some usage of terms that the way you utilize them, I should say, and that I have some disagreements with. And I was just curious what your take was on these. In particular, it was the term subjective. I've listened to your show for a long time. We've spoken a few times, so I think I have a general sense of what you mean by the word.

But I think you've also explicitly said that it's non-verifiable because it's like in the

contents of someone's mind.

Is that correct?

So there are subjective things for which there are evidence.

There are subjective things for which there are evidence. There are subjective things for which there are

no evidence, but it is very hard to prove. So if I say, I like pizza, then if I never eat pizza,

that that preference might be questioned. Of course, I could say, well, I like pizza, but I'm lactose

intolerant, or I'm gluten intolerant, or I like pizza, but I like it too much so I can't eat it

because it makes me fat or whatever. So if I say, I like philosophy, I think it's fairly clear,

...