Welcome back to Plenary Session Podcast.

And if you're watching on YouTube, welcome back to the channel.

I'm back here to do another video.

And this is about interpreting studies

because I think this is an important topic

that we don't talk enough about.

But first, I have to admit,

I, like many other people, have been enjoying this summer.

And I have been listening to a lot of podcasts.

And I really got turned on to some legal

podcasts.

And if you check out the show VPZD with my co-host, Zubimaniya, we talked a little bit about

these legal podcasts in the last episode, which came out, I think, just this morning.

And, you know, I'm kind of fascinated by law, and I have a bunch of questions about the law.

But one of the

things that struck me on this podcast was I feel like there's a difference in the culture

between academic law and academic medicine. An academic law, I think, incentivizes people and values

clever ideas, clever people.

I think that's the currency of the law.

And when I listen to these podcasts, thinking about how to interpret the Constitution

and how to talk about the Supreme Court and their legislation, you know, it's really about

coming up with sort of a clever way to harmonize the law, to build upon existing arguments,

...