Welcome back, everyone to a new episode of Your Wrong with Molly Hemingway, editor-in-chief

of the federalist

and david harsani senior writer at the washington examiner just as a reminder if you'd like to email

the show please do so at radio at thefederalist dot com we love to hear from you molly happy

holy week thank you very much and to you you're welcome thank you to pass over for me but yeah

same idea not the same idea, but yeah. It is. They're strongly related. So the Passover story in the

Old Testament is where we mark when God directs Jews to place, you know, blood on their

doorposts to Passover, the angel of death,

and then Jesus is the ultimate Passover in that he dies for the sins of the world.

So they are related.

And also it takes place at the same time as the Passover,

when Jesus is preparing for the Passover,

when everyone's preparing for the Passover is when

the passion takes place.

Let's talk about politics, Molly.

And let's start with the Supreme Court.

Now, let me just preface what we're going to talk about by saying that I don't think that

the founders ever envisioned the Supreme Court taking such a aggressive or assertive

role in governing the country. I think the country would have fallen apart a long time ago if

it hadn't been for this Supreme Court, which is, I believe, imperfect but upholds constitutional

order more than any other branch right now. And, you know, we've talked about this before and I wrote about it last week again.

So why don't you talk a little bit about since I think you have a much more expertise on this about the case,

...