And the herd and the Johnny Depp trial, the libel trial.

Now what happened here was a few years ago and the herd wrote a piece for the Washington

Post in which she wrote two years ago became a public figure representing domestic abuse.

Now it didn't actually mention Johnny Depp in the article, but his lawyer said it was

about him and his defamatory and as a consequence, sued Amber Heard.

Now it was a jury libel trial and they found in favour of Johnny Depp, I mean we're talking

$50 million, I mean it was also, there was one ruling in favour of Amber Heard, that

one of the agents of Johnny Depp had defamed Heard.

Now let's just have a quick look at a little bit of that verdict.

All right, Mr. Four person, is this the verdict of the jury?

All right, is it unanimous?

Thank you, sir.

In civil case number CL 2019 2911, Mr. Depp's claim against Ms. Heard.

One, as to the statement appearing in the online op-ed entitled Amber Heard, I spoke up

against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath, that has to change.

In the Washington Post's online edition, quote, I spoke up against sexual violence and

faced our culture's wrath, that has to change, end quote. Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven

all the elements of defamation? Answer? Yes.

Now we've got the brilliant writer, Lucia Osborne Crowley, who's tweets on this, I have read

all the way through the trial. So it was just, you know, absolutely brilliant reporting of what

was actually happening. I didn't watch the trial myself. So it was brilliant to be able to read

somebody who watched it and went through all the evidence and is an all-round expert on the issue.

...