meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate News

Why the Feds Want to Kill Noncompetes

Slate News

Slate Podcasts

News, Politics, News Commentary

4.56K Ratings

🗓️ 13 January 2023

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

You might think of noncompete agreements as mostly limited to highly skilled, highly paid tech workers to protect trade secrets. But one-third of workers bound by noncompetes make $13/hour or less: fast-food workers, security guards, and the like.


Noncompete clauses not only give employers leverage over their employees—both during and after their employment—but studies have shown the agreements are a weight on the economy, which is why the FTC is angling for a federal ban. 


Guest: Elizabeth Wilkins, director of the Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade Commission


Host: Lizzie O’Leary


If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next TBD. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

New Year, new me. Nah. I'm fine just the way I am. Doing the things I love. Like enjoying

0:07.7

a latte on the bus with some music or on a walk with a friend. My only resolution is

0:14.8

to enjoy more of what I love. Like switching up my usual with oat, soy, almond or coconut.

0:22.0

All delicious non-dairy alternatives available at Starbucks. For no extra charge. While stocks

0:27.9

last, subject to availability. Greetings. I hope everyone is staying safe and well. As you know,

0:43.4

these are some difficult times that we're going through right now. Times that were actually

0:48.0

quite unimaginable just a couple weeks ago. But together we will get through this.

0:52.2

Credential Security has an active Facebook page. It's filled with everything from videos like this

1:00.5

one about COVID in the spring of 2020 to post celebrating the holidays. Thanksgiving,

1:06.7

Christmas, Veterans Day. Even pictures of its security guards being recognized for their work.

1:13.4

But what Facebook doesn't show is that those guards who worked in a handful of different states

1:18.6

were forced to sign non-compete agreements that restricted who they could work for once they

1:23.4

left the company. Minimum wage security guards who had non-compete that prevented them from

1:28.6

working for a competing company within a hundred miles and with threatened damages of $100,000.

1:36.5

That's Elizabeth Wilkins, who runs the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission,

1:41.1

which sued Credential Security last week, saying the company imposed illegal non-compete restrictions

1:47.0

on its workers. This was a company that enforced those provisions against the security guards

1:52.4

and against the companies that tried to hire them. So, you know, when we're talking about these

1:57.3

things can be potentially coercive or exploitative of like an unequal relationship of power between

2:03.9

a worker and an employer. This is real life stuff we're talking about. Real life stuff that affects

2:09.2

an estimated 30 million workers. That's how many people the FTC thinks are likely covered by

2:15.0

non-compete agreements. Now, the commission wants to go further than just filing suit against

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.