meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Daily Article

Why did The New York Times run an anonymous op-ed?

The Daily Article

The Denison Forum

Christianity, News, Daily News, Religion & Spirituality

4.9576 Ratings

🗓️ 7 September 2018

⏱️ 6 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Our culture seems more acrimonious than ever. This podcast explores an unexpected reason for the divisiveness of our day and offers three steps toward unity tempered by grace. For more news discerned differently, or to receive the Daily Article via email, please visit denisonforum.org.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, I'm Jim Denison with Denison Forum, and this is the Daily Article for Friday, September 7, 2018.

0:07.8

I've never seen this much fewer caused by an op-ed, much less one whose author we don't know, but that's partly the point.

0:15.1

The New York Times chose on Wednesday to publish an op-ed from what it called a senior official in the White House who makes

0:21.1

extremely disparaging claims against President Trump. Speculation regarding the identity of the

0:26.2

writer has escalated in the days since. Some think Vice President Mike Pence is the writer. Secretary

0:32.1

of State Mike Pompeo had to deny authorship. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders

0:37.3

called on the, quote,

0:38.4

coward, who wrote the piece to, quote, do the right thing and resign, end quote. Many are focusing

0:43.9

on the truth or falsity of the writer's defamatory descriptions of the Trump White House. Others are

0:49.4

working to identify the author. Well, here's a question I've not seen debated. Why did the Times choose to

0:55.3

publish the op-ed in the first place? The editor who made the decision has said, quote,

1:00.6

we felt it was a very strong piece written by someone who had something important to say,

1:05.6

and who's speaking from a place of their own sense of personal ethics and conscience. That was

1:09.8

our main focus, end quote.

1:11.5

But it's worth asking whether the liberal New York Times would have made the same decision

1:16.0

if the op-ed had been written about Barack Obama when he was in the Oval Office,

1:20.5

or whether Fox News would have published last Wednesday's op-ed, given the opportunity.

1:25.9

According to one psychologist, confirmation bias occurs when we have

1:29.7

formed a view and then, quote, embrace information that confirms that view while ignoring or rejecting

1:35.9

information that casts out on it. Such bias is obvious every day in the media. We should not be

1:42.0

surprised that liberal and conservative commentators are reacting according to their previous opinions of the media. We should not be surprised that liberal and conservative commentators are

1:44.9

reacting according to their previous opinions of the president. Our divided media reflects our

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Denison Forum, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Denison Forum and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.