meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Bulwark Takes

Why Are CNN Hosts Defending Trump Like This?

Bulwark Takes

The Bulwark

News, News Commentary, Politics, Society & Culture

4.71.2K Ratings

🗓️ 10 September 2025

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

JVL and Andrew Egger take on CNN’s strange defense of Trump in the Epstein scandal. Why are their anchors repeating that Trump hasn’t been tied to any “wrongdoing" when their guests bring up his ties to Epstein?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Building a coffee business, serving the best Americano in town is up to you.

0:04.1

But winning back time and growing your business, leave that to sum up.

0:07.1

Take orders and payments anywhere with the new SumUp terminal.

0:09.9

Turn occasional customers into regulars with a free loyalty program.

0:13.4

And with the SumUp point of sale system, you'll always know when you're running low on your best selling blends.

0:17.9

Visit sumup.co.uk to learn more.

0:20.0

Hey, everybody. This is JVL here with my bulwark colleague, Andrew Agar. We're going to talk

0:26.5

about this weird thing CNN has where they're trying to cover for Donald Trump. Before we do it,

0:33.1

though, go ahead, hit like, hit subscribe, follow the channel.

0:39.6

It helps us more than you could possibly know.

0:50.2

Okay, so Andrew, this morning my ears pricked up when John Berman of CNN had on one of the Democrats on the Oversight Committee.

0:58.1

And in the course of their conversation, Berman went out of his way to say that Donald Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing. Again, I do want to say we have no reason to think that he

1:03.8

was in any way involved with that check itself. Also, no reason to think he's detected any wrongdoing

1:09.8

involving Jeffrey Epstein. You noted you're a prosecutor, you're a lawyer here. I would say we have lots of reasons to think he was involved in wrongdoing. I mean, at this point, there's a lot of smoke. There may be some fire, but I would just push back and say, I think there's a lot of reason to think Donald Trump was involved. Involved with what? I'm sorry, what exactly, what proof do you have

1:28.2

that he was involved with wrongdoing in regards to Jeffrey Epstein? And if that's the case,

1:32.7

why have there been no prosecutions over 20 years here? Because there haven't really been any

1:37.1

allegations that he was involved with wrongdoing. There are a lot of connections where Donald Trump

1:42.6

was named, right? We had a 14-year-old

1:44.8

claiming that she was raped by him, then withdrew that claim after she was apparently threatened.

1:49.9

His name appears a lot. And again, we at this point, our job is to find justice for these

1:54.8

survivors, and that means that we need to continue digging, knowing that there is a cover-up

1:58.9

taking place right now. And I didn't say that we have

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Bulwark, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Bulwark and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.