meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate News

Do Algorithms Make Sentencing Fairer?

Slate News

Slate Podcasts

Politics, News, News Commentary

4.56K Ratings

🗓️ 3 January 2020

⏱️ 17 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Around the country, states are employing algorithms to help reduce prison populations and predict recidivism. This week, we hear from a Wisconsin judge with serious reservations about the algorithm used in his state. Also: a deep dive into Virginia's risk-assessment algorithm and the surprising results of its implementation.

Guests:

Nicholas McNamara, judge on the circuit court of Dane County, Wisconsin.

Jennifer Doleac, associate professor of economics at Texas A&M and director of the Justice Tech Lab


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Judge McNamara?

0:05.7

Yes. Hi.

0:07.2

Hi. Hi. It's Lizzie O'Leary. How are you?

0:09.2

Just fine. Nice to meet you this way.

0:12.2

A few weeks ago, I called up a judge in Wisconsin named Nicholas McNamara.

0:17.8

He serves on the circuit court in Dane County, which includes the city of Madison, the state capital.

0:23.3

Before McNamara was a judge, he was a lawyer. He represented plaintiffs in negligence cases,

0:28.4

civil cases. But when he became a judge in 2009, that changed. His caseload became almost exclusively

0:35.1

criminal. Did you have a picture in your mind of what, say, evaluating an offender or sentencing would be like before you actually took office?

0:45.7

No. I had no idea.

0:47.9

I had no.

0:51.7

Eventually, of course, he figured it out.

0:54.9

As a starting point in Wisconsin, there are three primary sentencing factors for a judge to consider.

1:00.3

The gravity of the offense, the character of the offender, and the need to protect the public.

1:06.5

To assess these factors, Wisconsin judges can order what's called a pre-sentence report.

1:11.0

I want to get background information on the defendant and sometimes from victims when there's victims.

1:17.9

And that's what a pre-sentence report does.

1:20.4

And interviews family members of the defendant and of the victim and history of education

1:26.6

and traumatic life experiences for the defendant, other challenges,

1:31.6

disabilities, mental health, addiction issues.

1:36.0

With this information in hand, eventually a decision is made.

1:40.0

A sentence is handed down, but the process doesn't end there.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.