Welcome to a good football show week four waiver wire pod. I am Packerane. I am joined by John

Dagle of NBC Sports Edge. Dagle, how's it going? Everything is good. Now looking

in two week four unlike last week, which was like get your ducks in a row week. This is more

of a you can afford to get cute week. Lots of flyers you can add to the back

into your roster and both shallow and deeply. So looking forward to talking about some of these

individuals. Yeah, I will get to one that I feel like is the ultimate you can afford to get cute

here in a minute. But let's start with the big guy if he's available in your leagues. This is

where I don't think you want to get cute. If Chuba Hubbard is available and you have the chance

to add him, are you aggressively going after him, Dagle? Oh, yeah, absolutely. Hubbard out snapped

for Royce Freeman 40 to 11 last Thursday. App carrying him 10 to 5 over the last three quarters

and outtouched him as a whole 14 to 6 with 20 rounds to Freeman 6 over those last 45 minutes.

But what we knew following Friday's news because this news came out Friday is that the team is

for going putting McCapray on IR, which tells us they're at least targeting his return three weeks

from now. So miss two games come back on the third. At least that's what they're hoping for right now.

So with Hubbard, you have to assume you're bidding on a two week starter and bench spot afterwards,

which makes it a little more complicated. Also, I would like to hear your thoughts on Royce Freeman

because he's going to be a target in deeper leagues. But for me, it seems like more he's a

Jake Funk type player that you're really picking up and hoping hits if something happens ahead of him.

Which again, there's nothing wrong with that. We do that all the time strategically.

The only issue is now you're probably building more than you want to for that perceived role.

I completely agree with you. I think that Freeman is not going to be very usable. We saw

enough from them last week to, you know, if you kind of extrapolate that, it would work out to about

...