We Were Right - Weinstein Case Collapses
The Harvey Weinstein Trial: Unfiltered
The Unreported Story Society
4.2 • 857 Ratings
🗓️ 26 April 2024
⏱️ 17 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The New York Court of Appeals, overturned the Hollywood producer’s conviction for rape and sexual assault. But they only confirmed what we thought when we covered the Harvey Weinstein trial in 2020. On this bonus episode of The Harvey Weinstein Trial: Unfiltered you’ll hear in more detail why we were right all along. This was mob justice, this was politicized justice. This was the New York district attorney putting politics before the law. Sound familiar? We told you then you may not like Harvey Weinstein, but they’ll use the same tactics to go after you and the ones you love. That’s why we had to call out this miscarriage of justice when we saw it.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome to a special breaking news episode of the Harvey Weinstein trial unfiltered. |
| 0:06.9 | The breaking news today is that the New York Full Appeals Court has declared Weinstein's conviction unsafe and ordered a retrial. |
| 0:16.5 | This is of course not any surprise at all to us and any of you who've been listening |
| 0:22.4 | to the Harvey Weinstein trial unfiltered |
| 0:24.4 | podcast will remember our podcast we had actors reenacting the trial testimony |
| 0:29.6 | every day based on transcripts and this ruling is a confirmation of what we saw every day. |
| 0:37.0 | Harvey Weinstein is innocent and we have said it all long. |
| 0:41.0 | So this is a huge huge story today. I am on my own as you'll probably notice. My partner in |
| 0:47.6 | true crime was at the airport this morning when the news broke and he's on a plane to New York as I record this but I thought |
| 0:54.4 | we couldn't wait any longer to update you and it's extraordinary what the appeals court has said. |
| 1:00.5 | Here's part of it. The erroneous Sandoval ruling allowing the prosecution to cross-examine defendant |
| 1:06.7 | about allegations of charged and uncharged bad acts was breathtakingly inclusive of behavior that was |
| 1:15.5 | loadsome but not the type of conduct that would assist the jury in |
| 1:19.3 | measuring his credibility on the stand. The ruling thus served to discourage the defendant |
| 1:25.3 | from exercising his rights to present a defense and testify on his behalf. |
| 1:31.1 | Together, these errors deprived defendant of the self-standing |
| 1:36.5 | constitutional right to a fair trial and proof of guilt however overwhelming |
| 1:41.9 | can never be permitted to negate this right. |
| 1:44.0 | So that's from People versus Crimmins. |
| 1:47.0 | So according to that mostly female New York appeals court, |
| 1:51.0 | the trial judge made very significant errors during the case and Weinstein is now |
| 1:56.0 | entitled to a retrial. Another part of that ruling reads like this, we conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Unreported Story Society, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Unreported Story Society and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

