Terence, what's your outcome with this information?

So in an ideal situation for you, what would you like to see happen?

Well, I wanted to see the world change.

I wanted to see us get off of fossil fuels.

I wanted to see us get off the planet using resonance

and no longer burning chemicals.

I want to see us using resonance to heal our bodies and no longer using chemicals. I want to see us using resonance to heal our bodies and no longer using chemicals

or oil-based chemicals. What I want to see is the planet change. That was what I wanted to do.

I'm not sure that's going to happen. I feel like now what we have to do is start our own

breakaway society and use these technologies that they

are refusing to use and just build a whole separate world because they're not going to come

along because they are attached to this dollar.

So the idea of you wanting peer review and others to review it, it's for what? That promise.

That was happening before because it would open the door for them now to accept it and to start using it. But in view of the fact that more than likely, they're not going to review it. More than likely, and Eric Weinstein was right, we are not peers. I don't have the

degrees he has, and guess what he doesn't have, he doesn't have an understanding of how the

universe works. You don't think Eric Weinstein has no understanding of how the universe works because

he has rejected the geometry that supports how the universe

behaves. He didn't even evaluate the geometry. He did not, and then when I asked him about,

does an action times an action have a reaction concerning the one times one, he obsuscated.

I hate that word.

He ran away from it.

He kept diverting.

...