And what would you like me to ask chat GPT?

Just ask it to evaluate. Is it right or wrong?

I wouldn't put in my face on the GPT's answer.

Well, I couldn't get an evaluation from any of the, you know, authorities out there.

All the universities.

There we go.

After evaluating the document, necessity of final universe, the wave wave and there's a breakdown.

Interesting idea presented.

The paper introduced a wave-based mathematical framework to argue the universe must be finite.

It builds an enligment geometry, tetran shapes, and Howard Coma, ideas largely associated with

Terranzaida uses constant like wave reflection, standing waves, and energy quantization

to support those claims.

Critical issue, scientific inconsistencies, core mathematical flaw, 1 times 1 equals 2.

This claim contradicts fundamental arithmetic and is not accepted in any legitimate mathematical

system.

Multiplication is defined such as 1 times 1 equals 1.

Redefining this but had rigorously peer-reviewed mathematical framework makes the rest of the paper

logic untenable.

Two unverified concept, terms like Howard Coma, tetran shapes, Lynchman geometry are not recognized in mainstream

mathematical or physics.

These concepts do not appear in peer-reviewed journals.

Misapplication of physical laws.

...