Hello and welcome to outrage and optimism. I'm Tom Rivikarnak.

I'm Christiana Figueres.

And I'm Paul Dickinson.

And we are still together and we're still answering your many questions.

Today we're going to be looking at impacts, tradeoffs and how we talk about climate.

Thanks for joining us.

Okay, friends, so another round at these brilliant questions is going to be our third episode of listener questions.

And honestly, they've been fantastic. So thank you to everybody who wrote in.

And I guess we should just kick off. So I believe the first one is a question we have from Samia.

And we have a recording. So let's go to that. I'm Samia

and Marafa working for water aid in Bangladesh. I'm here in Willem attending COP 30 and I want

to ask the podcast if water is kept at the heart of the climate conversations. Because in Bangladesh

back home, water is how we see the impacts

of the changing climate. This is how the changing climate enters our homes. And I want to know from

you if water has been given the importance that it needs to be in the decision making.

A fantastic question. There's lots to say there.

Paul, should we start with you?

Well, I certainly don't know as much about the problems of water in Bangladesh as you do.

I mean, there are obviously two, I'm just going to talk a little bit about categories here.

People most closely associate problems with water in Bangladesh's rising sea levels,

where there's catastrophic problems for literally millions of people from rising sea levels. I remember seeing an extraordinary piece of work

that was about a necessity for families to tie babies up at night because if a baby were to

...