War: What Is it Good For?
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 11 November 2020
⏱️ 38 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
We talk to the historian Margaret MacMillan about the changing character of war, from the ancient world to the twenty-first century. Do we still understand the risks? Where are the conflicts of the future likely to break out? And how can we reconcile the terrible destructiveness of war with its capacity to bring about positive change? Plus we talk about why war produces so much great art.
Talking Points:
Is the way we commemorate war distancing us from the reality of it?
- Those who have seen war tend to be wary of it.
- There is complacency in a number of countries that war is something that ‘we’ don’t do anymore.
War is terrible, yet so much of the innovation that we value seems intertwined with it.
- For many people WWI exemplifies the futility of war, yet many of the things we value came out of that war, particularly political and institutional change.
- WWI essentially gave Europe modern welfare states and universal suffrage.
- The two world wars also led to much greater social equality.
- There seems to be a deep connection between peace and inequality, and violence and equality. But it might depend on what countries and what wars you look at.
If war is connected to innovation because it is so wasteful you cannot recreate those conditions.
- Perhaps we are doing something similar with COVID, but climate change is the true existential crisis.
- Climate change does not seem to be a unifying crisis.
- Declaring ‘war’ on an abstraction is dangerous. How do you know when it’s over? Wars on abstractions are wars without limits.
Templates from the past don’t fully apply to the US-China relationship.
- There is the nuclear element, which should hypothetically rule out war.
- There’s also the energy resource conflict question: China has been able to take responsibility for its own energy security.
- In the long run, it is in the interests of both the US and China to cooperate with each other. The problem is the political factor.
Mentioned in this Episode:
- Margaret MacMillan, War: How Conflict Shaped Us
- General Nick Carter’s interview with Sky News
- Walter Scheidel, The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century
- Rana Mitter, China’s Good War
- ‘La Grande Illusion’
- Tim O’Brien, The Things They Carried
- ‘Apocalypse Now’
Further Learning:
- Margaret MacMillan, Paris 1919 Talking Politics History of Ideas: Max Weber on...
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my name is David Ronsman and this is Talking Politics. Today is Armistice Day |
| 0:12.9 | and we're talking to the historian Margaret McMillan about war. It's past, it's present |
| 0:18.9 | and it's possible future. Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London |
| 0:26.4 | Reviewer Books. If you enjoy listening to Talking Politics you'll definitely enjoy reading |
| 0:31.4 | the LRB. That's why they publish a reading list of relevant writing from the archive |
| 0:36.4 | to a company every episode on lrb.co.uk and also why you Talking Politics listeners are |
| 0:44.3 | invited to subscribe for just one pound of an issue via the url lrb.me slash talk. |
| 0:53.7 | Talking Politics in partnership with the London Reviewer Books. |
| 1:00.7 | As you'll hear at the end of this interview Margaret is speaking to us from Toronto. In 2018, |
| 1:17.7 | she gave the re-flectures on the subject of the history of warfare and they've now been turned |
| 1:23.7 | into a book that covers just about everything about war. We started there by talking about |
| 1:29.7 | the meaning of today. We're recording this on 11-11 so it's Armistice Day. On Sunday and |
| 1:37.7 | remember on Sunday in the UK General Sannick Carter, the chief of the defence staff, gave |
| 1:44.7 | an interview, reflective interview, series of interviews about war. The headline that the |
| 1:50.7 | newspapers ran with was that he warned that Covid could lead to World War III, which was a bit of a |
| 1:55.7 | stretch, I think from what he said. But the main theme of what he was talking about was as he saw |
| 2:01.7 | it the danger that remembrance, particularly the remembrance of the World Wars, had left us |
| 2:06.7 | in 2022 remote from the reality of war. I think it was one of those warnings that |
| 2:11.7 | generals sometimes like to do, which is just to let us know once again that war is a real |
| 2:16.7 | possibility for us and it is really awful. I mean he said, people have to remember war |
| 2:21.7 | involves killing as though we might have forgotten it. Do you think it's a real danger that the way |
| 2:27.7 | we commemorate war now has left us too distant from the experience of it? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

