Viewsroom Predictions 2017: Part 1
Viewsroom
Reuters
4.4 • 58 Ratings
🗓️ 29 December 2016
⏱️ 44 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hi, just leave on work now. Sorry, it's a bit loud. |
| 0:03.4 | Um, basically, so I was thinking we could get Macies tonight. Had a big Mac on my mind all day, and delivery fee on the app is now from 99P. So you win? Of course you are. Love you. Bye. Exclusively on the McDonald's app. 18 plus, service fee and small order fee may apply. Participating restaurants. Serving times and teas and seas apply. The opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the participants, not of Reuters' news. |
| 0:35.5 | Welcome once again, Views Room listeners. |
| 0:37.8 | We'd like to take this opportunity as we get towards the end of the year to thank you for |
| 0:42.0 | listening both to this week's episode and for all of 2016. |
| 0:48.1 | Now this week we'd like to do something a little bit different. |
| 0:50.7 | Rather than telling you what we think of what has been happening, we're going to give you our ideas of what may well happen next year. It's what we call our predictions. I know it's a name you never would have thought up yourself. Really, really not obvious whatsoever. And in the studio with me today, I've got Kevin Allison, who's a Chicago colonist, and also the guy we put in charge of running |
| 1:12.4 | predictions from the U.S. for us, along with a couple of colleagues around the world. |
| 1:16.5 | Kevin, just give us a quick introduction to the process we've gone through and what we're |
| 1:20.6 | looking to get out of these predictions. |
| 1:21.7 | Right. Well, every year, our columnists around the world, from Hong Kong to London, to |
| 1:27.0 | New York, to Chicago York to Chicago to Washington. |
| 1:29.2 | We get together and try to push things a little bit forward and say what are the really |
| 1:33.5 | big themes and issues and specific issues around companies and markets that we think are going |
| 1:38.8 | to be relevant to investors next year. |
| 1:41.2 | So we go through a good process of a month or two of back and forth, chatting. |
| 1:44.8 | We had a wonderful session with you a month or so ago where we went through various ideas. We're looking at what, sort of 30, 40 pieces in a book and then another 20 or 30 that will publish as well in addition to the book? That's right. And these are meant to be, well, we'd love for them to be correct. We'd love to correctly predict things, and we have done in the past. |
| 2:02.6 | So back in 2013, we wrote... be well we'd love for them to be correct we'd love to correctly predict things and |
| 2:01.4 | we have done in the past so back in in 2013 we wrote a prediction that the oil |
| 2:06.5 | market looked like it was at risk of a sudden collapse and then in 2014 it did |
| 2:10.1 | was yours wasn't it was indeed but more important than being correct I think |
| 2:16.2 | is that the views we try to make them like we always breaking views, we try to make them provocative and interesting. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Reuters, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Reuters and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

