US National Security, CFIUS and COVID-19
Bribe, Swindle or Steal
Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International
4.9 • 582 Ratings
🗓️ 15 April 2020
⏱️ 23 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Darshak Dholakia, a partner in Dechert's Washington office, provides a timely overview of the current Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approach to foreign investment in the US, comparable laws of other countries and how scrutiny of healthcare and biotechnology sectors may increase in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to the podcast, bribes, swindle, or steel. |
| 0:09.2 | I'm Alexandra Ragi. |
| 0:11.0 | Today we're discussing Siphyas, that is, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United |
| 0:15.0 | States. |
| 0:16.0 | My guest is Darshak Dahlakia. |
| 0:18.0 | Darshak is a partner in Deckerets, Washington, D.C. office where he focuses his practice |
| 0:22.1 | primarily on international trade issues, including matters of national security and foreign policy. |
| 0:28.0 | Darsak, thank you so much for joining me. |
| 0:30.3 | Oh, thank you for having me, Alexandra. |
| 0:31.9 | I helped you out with the acronym for Siphyas, which you live and breathe, but will be new to |
| 0:36.4 | some of our listeners. But can you take us through the importance of this, the application, and what people should know about Sipheus. |
| 0:44.3 | Sipheus is an interagency committee that's comprised of nine members. |
| 0:49.3 | It's chaired by the Secretary of Treasury, but it also has representatives from the Department of Defense, |
| 0:55.2 | Department of Commerce, Department of Homeland Security, and many others. |
| 0:59.1 | Its primary task is to evaluate foreign direct investment inbound into the U.S. to determine |
| 1:05.6 | whether that investment could potentially have a negative impact on U.S. national security |
| 1:10.2 | interests or U.S. critical |
| 1:11.8 | infrastructure. We'll get into it, but those terms can be sort of as broad as whatever administration |
| 1:17.2 | in power wants them to be. It's not just when a non-U.S. company is looking to buy a U.S. |
| 1:23.1 | defense manufacturer, for example, where the national security implications are clear. But it's been used |
| 1:28.7 | pretty broadly, especially in recent years, to protect U.S. economic security as well, particularly |
| 1:33.8 | in high technology sectors where the U.S. enjoys some, at least has some perceived technological |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

