meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Unresolved Questions Following the School Choice Victory of Carson v. Makin

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 3 October 2022

⏱️ 18 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

School choice litigation has come a long way in the modern era of advancing educational freedom. Michael Bindas of the Institute for Justice details the big win in Carson v. Makin and what might come next.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Monday, October 3rd,

0:04.2

2022. I'm Caleb Brown.

0:06.5

The Religious Liberty School Choice case, Carson v. Macon

0:09.8

comes at the end of two decades of educational freedom cases.

0:13.6

Michael Bindus is of the Institute for Justice.

0:15.7

He was on the winning side of Carson V. Macon,

0:17.8

advancing parental choice in education.

0:20.2

He says there are still some big unresolved questions for advocates of religious and educational freedom.

0:26.0

And he spoke at the Cato Institute's Constitution Day festivities last month.

0:30.0

But I'm going to focus a little bit differently on Carson as a school choice case.

0:34.8

I'm not a religious liberty litigator per se.

0:37.6

I am a school choice litigator.

0:40.1

IJ defense school choice programs around the country.

0:43.2

And so I'm going to focus on Carson from that perspective,

0:46.1

while it's certainly addressing the religion clause issues

0:49.3

that came up in the litigation.

0:51.3

Now, since the modern school choice movement was in its infancy back in the early 90s, the big unresolved

0:59.3

question was whether choice is permissible under the federal establishment clause.

1:03.5

Opponents of choice argue that because some parents might choose religious schools,

1:07.7

that somehow constituted a state establishment of religion.

1:11.3

And thankfully, the Supreme Court

1:13.1

roundly rejected that argument back in 2002

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.