This is the Friends Fist-to-Dubating Society.

I'm John Batcher with my colleague, Professor H.J. McInder,

International Relations.

Keefe spent the first few days of the week

between two imperatives, one the counteroffensive,

and two the breaking of the dam from where told the inside.

And we're told it is Russian saboteurs.

Of course, the Russians say it's Keefe saboteurs,

but in any event it's been called Ecoside.

The counteroffensive is more compelling right now

because, fog of war, we don't know if it's successful.

The reports from London suggests there are successes

and some disappointments on the battlefield.

Professor, the twist here is that Keefe exists

as long as the United States and NATO

continue to support the both the war effort and the population

and the structure that's necessary to keep the pipeline

of equipment and fuel and electricity flowing.

So Keefe's point of view right now is entirely dependent

on capitals that it doesn't have major influence.

What is Keefe's point of view knowing how vulnerable it is

to NATO?

...