Bill, a blogger who goes by Andrew, has got my attention.

He writes prolifically on his deconstruction of his Christian faith.

And by the way, deconstruction these days means everything from making doctrinal adjustments

to your theology, to outright rejection of Christian theism.

For Andrew, it seems to be the latter.

Let me just ask you Bill, deconstruction is not a new word, but it is kind of a new

term.

We've got all these people who are saying they're deconstructing their faith, and it's all

over the map.

It doesn't mean one thing.

Have you been here in this?

Yes, I think it's a motif of postmodernism, Kevin, that you deconstruct or disassemble

the traditional structures and values and ways of thinking and replace it.

It's so ironic for me, because immersed as I am in doing this systematic philosophical

theology at present, I am engaged in the task of theological construction.

That's my interest.

I don't want to deconstruct things.

I want to construct a positive, coherent account of the world from a Christian point of

view.

In this blog, he claims that two prominent experts on the resurrection of Jesus, Mike

Lakona and Dale Ellison, admit that there is not good evidence for the event.

I know you've shared the platform with Mike, Bill, but what about Dale Ellison?

...