Welcome back to Reasonable Faith with Dr. William Lane Craig.

Hey, it's Kevin Harris, let's pick up where we left off last time with this panel discussion

that produced some interesting exchanges between the two Richards, that's Dawkins and

Swinburne. Dr. Craig has so much to say about the topics they discussed and as always you

can dive deep into the free resources available at reasonablefaith.org and you can also donate

to the work and ministry of reasonable faith right there on our website and we pray that

God will multiply and use whatever gift you give. We so appreciate it.

Reasonablefaith.org, now let's get back into the studio with Dr. Craig.

This next clip pretty much spells out Dawkins' main objection and results in an exchange between

him and Swinburne. Watch this, this is clip number four.

Richard Swinburne a moment ago said any scientifically minded person would believe that God is the

ultimate cause. Why is it about this explanation that you're not happy to entertain Richard?

Don't you know, is it simply to do? Isn't it obvious? Is it simplicity, the main point though?

Or is it just something non-physical?

Richard Swinburne is saying that God is simple because he's a single entity.

How can he be a single entity? If he's simultaneously controlling the universe, every particle

in the universe, he's forgiving our sins, he's giving us free will, he's deciding whether

or not you'll die or not at us on a certain day. Such a thing is not a single simple entity.

It's a highly complicated mammoth, great big fat entity.

Well, take another example of a very simple entity. A particle of matter here. This particle

of matter is influencing all sorts of other particles of matter, all over the universe.

How can it do that with just being one particle of matter? Well, it does according to the law

...